Tag Archives: law & taxes

Termination of employment without trial \”noiseless\” separation of employees 1. In times of crisis like these are almost daily business separation of staff. Unfortunately can often only to personnel costs significantly lowered and kept the company in the black. Separation of employees can hardly avoid for a company but also because these fast-moving times. Just who keeps up with on the battle field of new media, dealing with the ever more complicated communication platforms and has a high degree of flexibility, strength and resistance to stress, appeared in the front ranks.

So an employee who had always good work in the past, due to lack of know-how and lack of readiness is the new world of work\”to adapt to a load will be. Hear other arguments on the topic with SurveyGizmo. Another way the employer remains rare, than to separate from this staff. Often just these workers are not vulnerable in terms of protection against dismissal and are still tolerated in operation in the absence of an alternative solution. This acquiescence usually leads to a tense atmosphere in the company and adversely affects the operating climate. Outwardly, the company loses its progress, which can ultimately mean the position on the market. The employer should not hope to say goodbye to unwanted employees due to the unsatisfactory situation itself. Rather is often years of cooperation\”to count, which has a negative effect on both parties: it creates a permanent mutual dissatisfaction and a major disruption of operation peace, which earlier or later the workforce can be a total hit. 2.

the legal situation the fast separation desired by the employer of the employee is usually not possible. Often preclude legal and collective dismissal protection-related reasons. \”Employers rarely tells his employees for understandable reasons, that this undesirable\” is. The staff is usually the suspenseful atmosphere, is rarely aware of a fault\”. This results mainly from the missing communication of the employer.

Gepackverpatungen, damage to baggage and flight delays the liability limits for damages resulting from a flight delay, or the delayed luggage, for damage to baggage and for damage to persons, which are based on the international Montreal Convention, were raised in Germany by the regulation on the implementation of customized limits in the Montreal Convention with effect from December 30, 2009 in accordance with the international law and Community law by around 13%. Thus, affected passengers are entitled to higher reimbursement services to airlines and tour operators. by Jan Bartholl (lawyer for travel and air traffic law) MA 2010 (Ko) on the flight in the holiday motto applies: open as the sky, wide as the sea! However, something goes wrong with the porters in the holiday, reimbursement and compensation claims are not limitless travellers and passengers. Who affected of a flight delay,. delayed baggage, baggage damage or even loss of luggage, including claims against the airline and the travel organizer on claims for damages and reimbursement of expenses. Basically the affected passengers can claim all damages, expenses and costs from a baggage delay or a delay of the flight towards the contractual and the operating airline. How far the compensation claims and which claims the passenger after claims the reason and can make depends on the remedies to which refers the passenger. The air traffic rights is a fragmented field of law in which the claims can be supported by passengers on different international standards, European regulations, directives and laws of individual Member States and signatory States.

Which claim based on an affected passenger can support his claims, is in some cases the claim destination the traveler determine. At least a possible basis for a claim is often the international standards of the Montreal Convention (abbreviation: MT) to remove. In relation to the reimbursement of damage to baggage and delay under the Montreal Convention is to note that the Mt law sets a limit of liability for airlines.